Skip to main content

Here's All You Need To Know About Indian Digital Tax

The Covid-19 outbreak has compelled businesses to transcend from traditional to digital models of work. With business models evolving on account of mass digitization, the complexities from a regulatory and taxation standpoint have only amplified. The advent and access to technology have enabled businesses to carry on business-as-usual with minimal physical presence.

Unsurprisingly, India has the second-largest online users in the world, with over 560 million internet users, and hence, from the viewpoint of its tax revenue base, digital businesses could not be overlooked. However, as is the case in other jurisdictions, Indian tax laws were suited for conventional business models such as brick and mortar stores and thus in dire need of an overhaul.

Recent Amendments

To ensure that value created digitally is appropriately taxed; two significant amendments were introduced in Indian taxation laws in the recent past –

The “Equalization Levy” – a tax aimed at foreign digital companies has been in place since 2016 and levied a 6% tax payable on gross revenues from online advertising services, which raked over Rs. 550 crores in fiscal year 2017-2018. The new amendment, effective from April 1, 2020, essentially expands the equalization levy from online advertising to nearly all online commerce activities done in India by businesses that do not have taxable presence in India through applicability of 2% on its revenues.

Specifically, it is levied on consideration receivable by the e-commerce operator for supply or services or facilitation of supply or service to – Person resident in India, Non-resident under specified circumstances such as through sale of data collected from a person resident in India, and Person who buys goods or services through an IP address located in India.

In addition to the equalization levy, India introduced the concept of “Significant Economic Presence” (SEP) for the purposes of corporate income tax, which expanded to include the following:
  • Advertisement which targets a customer residing in India or who accesses advertisement through internet with Indian internet protocol (IP) address.
  • Sale of data collected from a person residing in India or who uses an IP address located in India.
  • Sale of goods/services using data collected from a person residing in India or who uses Indian internet protocol (IP) address.

The Significant Economic Presence test coupled with Equalization Levy represents one of the more coordinated efforts to tax digital business models. The strategy is in line with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) BEPS Action 1 report from 2015, to bring digital giants like Facebook, Amazon, Google, Netflix, etc. within the realm of local taxes.

Implications On India

The amendments have brought in a wave of positive implications for India. Companies without physical presence in India, but having digital presence, that were earlier kept away from the taxation framework, have now been brought under the ambit of local tax laws. At the outset, companies without a physical presence in India but earning revenues from Indian audience will no longer be able to evade taxation by moving their offices to tax havens.

Further, digital taxation provides a level-playing field to both domestic and international companies that would have otherwise received an unfair competitive advantage over small or medium enterprises and startups. Furthermore, the e-commerce market is expected to grow to $200 billion by 2026 and taking a fair share of the pie will substantially increase revenues for the Indian government.

On the other hand, the imposition of digital taxes may strain trade relationships with countries especially the USA, which is a home-ground for most digital giants like Google, Netflix, Amazon, to name a few. This taxation framework is likely to adversely impact startup companies during their preliminary growth and expansion stages. Moreso, higher taxes are likely to hinder advancement and companies will most likely pass on part of this tax to end-users and/or to sellers.

What Other Countries Are Doing?

Presently, there exists no international accord for taxation of digital business models. But unilateral measures have been adopted by foreign jurisdictions to address the issue of digital taxation. France, recently, approved 3% digital tax (DST) on the revenues generated by the global technology giants like Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon, known as GAFA tax in its territory by virtue of the Digital Service Tax Act.

Similarly, Italy also introduced 3% DST on technology companies generating revenues from the digital services and prescribed a minimum threshold of revenue generation of 5,500,000 euros from Italy only. Australia, Malaysia, and Uganda are also following suit by imposing digital taxes on technology giants.

Conclusion

Introduction of digital taxation amendments at a time when the world economies are grappling for revenues, followed by a drastic shift in work patterns from the traditional brick-and-mortar format to remote methods of work, this move appears to be a step in the right direction with a view to capitalise on the changing working and buying patterns of people and ultimately pump up revenue collections during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Pursuant to a report from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology in partnership with McKinsey, the Indian economy can generate over $1 trillion from the digital industry by 2025. In this wave of digital boom, India is keeping up with the global expansion of digital economy through adequate taxation of technology giants.


Know about us - https://thetaxsupport.com
You can find more articles on at https://thetaxsupport.com/blog
You can find tutorial videos on at https://www.youtube.com/c/vipinsanger

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why You Should Not Use Credit Card..!!

Do you make purchases using credit cards?  Does one want to understand why you should not be using credit cards? A number of you'll think that employing a card is intelligent. There're basically three reasons that cause you to feel so: • Reward points like cash back • Zero interest if you pay on time • No got to carry cash We hardly got to pay the cardboard issuing bank anything aside from the minimum annual fee. Then how do these banks earn profit using their customer? Let's explain with an example: We use Facebook for free of charge, right? Then how does Facebook make money? They use our personal data, likes and dislikes to point out the target ads which match our needs. Now you get the purpose that there is nothing free within the world. Can you outwit the master/visa card companies? When you use a card, the parties involved within the transaction are: • The cardholder • The merchant • The merchant's bank Each time you (the cardho

Critical Analysis of the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020

Amendment to the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’) seems to be a routine activity of the Indian Government. The Act was amended by the Companies Amendment Act, 2015, 2017, 2019 and now, in 2020 (as proposed). Every time, the object of the amendment is different – from the ease of doing business to ease of living for corporates.  With the Government’s objective of facilitating greater ease of living to law-abiding corporate, it had constituted Company Law Committee (‘Committee’) on September 18, 2019. The overall objective of the Government and the Committee was to decriminalize some more provisions of the Act based on their gravity and to take other necessary measures to provide further ease of living for corporates and companies in the country. The Committee submitted its report in November 2019.  Based on the recommendations of the Committee and an internal review by the Government, the Companies Amendment Bill, 2020 proposed amendment to various provisions of the Act, which